Trends in Biosciences
  • Year: 2013
  • Volume: 6
  • Issue: 6

Effect of Different Farming Methods on Maize (Zea mays. L) Productivity and Soil Microbial Status

  • Author:
  • N. Vijaya1,, Vinayak Hosamani2, S. N. Vinodakumar2, S. Raghavendra3
  • Total Page Count: 3
  • Page Number: 808 to 810

1Dept. of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Navile Shivamogga UAS, Bangalore, Karnataka-577 201, India

2Dept. of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka-584 104, India

3Dept. of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry, College of Agriculture, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka-584 104, India

*Email: vin3234@rediffmail.com, vin3234@gmail.com

Online published on 3 January, 2014.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2007 at ZARS, Navile campus Shivamogga, Karnataka (India) to study the impact of different farming methods on productivity of maize and microbial activity in soil. The farming methods viz., zero budget farming (Subash Palekar's method), organic farming, inorganic farming, package of practices, zero budget plus inorganic farming methods. Results, of the study revealed that among the methods followed the package of practices significantly increased the growth and yield attributes of maize. Highest grain yield of 12.24 t ha−1 and stover yield of 8.90 t ha1 was recorded in package of practices compared to other farming methods. Whereas, the highest bacterial, fungal, and actinomycetes population of 11.46 x 104, 25x 103 and 19.62x103 CFU g−1 soil respectively was recorded under package of practices at harvest stage of the crop, but at 30 days after sowing (DAS) the highest bacterial and fungal population of 21.77x104 CFU g−1 soil and 43 x103 CFU g−1 soil was recorded under organic farming method however the lowest microbial population was recorded under inorganic farming method.

Keywords

Farming methods, Zero budget farming, Organic farming, Inorganic farming, Package of practices, CFU (Cellular farming units)