Introduction

tsi

The Social ION

2319-35812456-7523

Pt. Govind Mohan Mishra Smriti Sansthan

tsi-12-1and2-005

10.5958/2456-7523

10.5958/2456-7523.2023.00006.X

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Unemployment in India and Way-out

Srivastava

Manish

Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Vidyant Hindu PG College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

^*Email id: manishhindvi@gmail.com

Online Published on 06 December, 2023.

0601-122023

121and246561609202310102023

2023

IndianJournals.com

Introduction

Unemployment has persistently been a significant concern for India, a country with a diverse and vast population. Various factors contribute to this issue, including demographic patterns, economic factors and shifts in global economic dynamics. This essay delves into a concise overview of the unemployment scenario in India. India, often characterized as a young nation, boasts of a demographic dividend – a significant portion of its population lies within the working age. According to the World Bank, approximately two-thirds of India’s 1.3 billion-strong population are below the age of 35 (World Bank, 2020). Such demographics can be an asset for the nation, ensuring a large and productive workforce. However, the benefit of this demographic structure is only realized if adequate job opportunities exist. The Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) of 2018-19 highlighted a grim picture, with the unemployment rate in India reaching a 45-year high of 6.1% (Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, 2019). The urban unemployment rate stood at 7.8%, while the rural areas witnessed a rate of 5.3%. Additionally, a significant issue is the underemployment. Many individuals, especially in rural areas, might have some work but not enough to be fully employed, or they might be working in roles that underutilize their skills and education.

One cannot discuss unemployment in India without touching upon the challenges faced by the youth. The same PLFS data revealed that the unemployment rate for urban males in the age group of 15-29 years was a staggering 23.7% (Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, 2019). Such figures are alarming, particularly when considering the potential economic, social and psychological implications for the country’s youth. Several reasons underpin the unemployment issue in India. The education system, for instance, often fails to equip graduates with industry-relevant skills. As a result, even as companies in the IT, banking, or manufacturing sectors expand, there’s a palpable skills gap. The mismatch between what educational institutions teach and what industries require has contributed to a scenario where jobs might be available, but suitable candidates are not. Another aspect is the structural shift in the economy. Traditionally, agriculture has been a significant employment provider. Still, with increasing mechanization and families moving away from farming, there’s been a decrease in agriculture-based jobs. Simultaneously, the manufacturing sector, which could absorb this workforce, hasn’t grown at a pace rapid enough to accommodate them (Chandrasekhar and Ghosh, 2019).

Economic slowdowns further exacerbate the problem. For instance, the economic deceleration during 2019-2020, even before the COVID-19 pandemic, resulted in significant job losses in various sectors, including automobiles, real estate and textiles. Additionally, the informal sector, which employs a considerable chunk of the Indian workforce, offers low wages and little job security. Many who work in this sector live in a state of vulnerability, with no assurance of consistent income or job continuity. Addressing unemployment in India is not merely an economic imperative but also a social one. A significant portion of the unemployed are young, educated individuals, potentially leading to social unrest and mental health issues among the youth. To harness the potential of its demographic dividend, India needs to ensure that its youth are gainfully employed and contributing productively to the nation’s growth. Unemployment in India is a multi-faceted problem influenced by educational gaps, economic shifts and demographic patterns. Addressing it requires a comprehensive approach involving policy reforms, educational restructuring and economic revitalization.

Evolution of Employment Patterns in India and Major Historical ImpactsA.Evolution of Employment Patterns in India

India’s employment patterns have evolved significantly over time, reflecting its socio-political changes, economic transformations and global interactions. Historically, the Indian economy was predominantly agrarian. Even post-independence, a substantial portion of India’s workforce was engaged in agriculture. However, as the country began its journey towards industrialization and service-oriented activities, employment patterns started shifting (Krishnan, 2011). The 1960s and 1970s witnessed a modest rise in industrial employment. The manufacturing sector, though growing, was still nascent and could not absorb the vast majority migrating from rural areas seeking employment. The service sector, especially post the 1980s, began to emerge as a major employer, with IT, banking and finance becoming prominent by the 2000s. The evolution also mirrors the urbanization trend in India. As urban centers expanded, they attracted a significant portion of the workforce from rural areas. Yet, many migrants found employment in the informal sector, characterized by unstable jobs without any significant benefits or job security (Mehrotra and Parida, 2019).

B.Major Events Impacting Employment throughout History

Industrialization (Late 19^th – Early 20^th Century): With the advent of British colonial rule, India saw the beginnings of industrialization. The establishment of railways, ports and factories affected employment patterns as many artisans and small-scale industries faced decline and people began moving to urban areas seeking factory jobs. However, this also led to the exploitation of the workforce, especially in the textile mills of Bombay and jute mills of Calcutta (Roy, 2002).

Post-Independence Planning (1950s - 1980s): After gaining independence in 1947, India adopted a socialist-inspired economic model with a focus on state-led industrialization. Five-year plans were introduced, with significant investments in public sector enterprises. This led to the creation of formal jobs in sectors like steel, coal and machinery (Chakrabarty, 2008).

Economic Liberalization (1991 onwards): Facing a balance of payment crisis in 1991, India initiated economic liberalization policies, reducing state control in many sectors and inviting foreign investments. The service sector, especially IT and BPO, benefited immensely. Cities like Bangalore and Hyderabad emerged as IT hubs, employing millions (Kohli, 2006).

Globalization (Late 20th – Early 21st Century): Globalization exposed Indian industries to international competition and global market dynamics. While this led to job creation in sectors that could compete globally, like software services, it also meant job losses in sectors that were rendered uncompetitive (Nayyar, 2008).

Demographic Shifts (21st Century): With a large youth population, there was increased pressure on the job market in the 21st century. Though India had a demographic advantage, the challenge lay in skilling this workforce and providing them with adequate employment opportunities (Mehrotra and Parida, 2019).

India’s employment patterns have continually evolved, reflecting broader socioeconomic and political changes. From being an agrarian economy, shifting towards industrialization and finally emerging as a major service-driven economy, India’s employment landscape has witnessed several pivotal moments that have defined its current state.

Major Events Impacting Employment throughout History

Historical epochs have been punctuated by transformative events and movements that have substantially influenced employment landscapes. From technological advancements to economic strategies, these milestones have reshaped how societies perceive and engage in work. This essay provides an overview of some major events that have significantly impacted employment globally.

Industrial Revolution (Late 18th to Early 19th Century)

Overview: Originating in Great Britain, the Industrial Revolution marked a shift from agrarian economies based on manual labor and hand-crafted goods to industrial economies characterized by mechanized production.

Employment Impact: There was a migration from rural areas to urban centers as factories became the focal points of employment. New professions emerged, but traditional craftsmen faced challenges as machines replaced manual labor (Mokyr, 1999).

Great Depression (1930s):

Overview: The most severe economic downturn in modern history, the Great Depression began after the stock market crash of 1929 and persisted until the late 1930s.

Employment Impact: Mass unemployment became a global concern, with rates soaring in many countries. The crisis led to significant policy changes, including the introduction of New Deal programs in the U.S., aimed at job creation (Bernanke, 1983).

Post-World War II Economic Boom (Late 1940s to 1960s):

Overview: Following the devastation of World War II, many Western economies experienced a prolonged period of rapid economic growth.

Employment Impact: Industries related to infrastructure rebuilding and consumer goods saw an employment surge. The services sector also began its ascent as a major source of jobs (Crafts and Toniolo, 1996).

Economic Liberalization and Globalization (Late 20<sup>th</sup> Century):

Overview: Many countries adopted policies to reduce trade barriers and integrate with the global economy. A notable example is India’s 1991 economic liberalization.

Employment Impact: There was a rise in jobs linked to global supply chains, from manufacturing to IT services. However, some sectors faced challenges due to increased global competition (Sachs and Warner, 1995).

Digital Revolution and the Rise of Automation (Late 20th Century Onwards):

Overview: Advancements in digital technologies revolutionized various sectors, from communications to manufacturing.

Employment Impact: While tech industries saw significant job growth, many traditional roles faced obsolescence threats due to automation. The demand for digital literacy and tech-savvy professionals surged (Brynjolfsson and McAfee, 2014).

Employment landscapes have continually evolved, influenced by significant historical events. These milestones have dictated the dynamics of job creation, displacement and transformation, reminding societies of the perpetual need to adapt and innovate.

Current Scenario of Unemployment in India

Understanding the unemployment situation in India requires a comprehensive dive into statistics, demographics and the types of unemployment present in the economy. Here’s an overview based on data available in January 2022.

Statistics and Figures Relating to Unemployment in India: As of late 2021, the unemployment rate in India hovered around 7-9%, though it spiked to higher levels in the immediate aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns (Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy [CMIE], 2022).

Demographic Breakdown:

Urban vs Rural: Urban areas often witnessed higher unemployment rates compared to rural areas, partly due to the seasonal nature of agricultural work that provides temporary employment in rural regions (NITI Aayog, 2019).

Male vs Female: Female unemployment rates have consistently been higher than male rates. Traditional societal norms, gender biases and safety concerns have played roles in this disparity (Klasen and Pieters, 2015).

Age Groups: Younger individuals, especially those in the age bracket of 20-30, face higher unemployment rates. This is a reflection of the challenges new entrants encounter in the job market and the skills gap in contemporary education (Chand and Sahoo, 2020).

Types of Unemployment Prevalent in India:

Frictional Unemployment: This refers to people transitioning between jobs or entering the workforce for the first time. It’s a natural type of unemployment present in all economies, reflecting the time taken for job-seekers to find a match for their skills (Borjas, 2019).

Structural Unemployment: Caused by mismatches between the skills employers want and the skills workers have. Rapid technological changes and evolving industry requirements often lead to this type of unemployment in India (NITI Aayog, 2019).

Cyclical Unemployment: Related to economic downturns. The COVID-19 pandemic-induced economic slowdown is a recent example where many lost jobs due to reduced economic activity (CMIE, 2020).

Seasonal Unemployment: Common in agriculture-dominated economies like India. As agricultural activities are not uniform throughout the year, laborers often face unemployment during off-seasons (Datt et al., 2017).

India’s unemployment scenario is complex, influenced by a mix of structural, cyclical and seasonal factors. Addressing it requires multi-pronged strategies, incorporating both short-term relief measures and long-term systemic reforms.

Factors Contributing to Unemployment in India

India’s unemployment scenario is the result of a confluence of various economic, social, political and technological factors. Delving into these allows for a comprehensive understanding of the intricacies surrounding the issue.

A.Economic Factors:

Slow Economic Growth: Stagnant or declining GDP growth can lead to reduced hiring or even layoffs as businesses face declining revenues and profitability (Romer, 1990).

Sectoral Imbalances: Disparities in growth rates across sectors can lead to employment imbalances. For instance, rapid growth in the services sector compared to manufacturing or agriculture can lead to uneven job opportunities across these sectors (Papola and Kannan, 2017).

B.Social Factors:

Population Growth: A rapidly growing population can exacerbate unemployment if job creation doesn’t keep pace. India, with its demographic dividend, needs to create a vast number of jobs annually to cater to the new entrants in the job market (Dreze and Sen, 2013).

Education-System Mismatch: The education system might not always align with industry demands, leading to a situation where graduates don’t possess the skills sought by employers (Aggarwal, 2013).

C.Political Factors:

Policy Stagnation: Lack of proactive and adaptive policy-making can hinder job creation. This might be due to political instability or other priorities taking precedence over employment generation (Kohli, 2006).

Lack of Effective Implementation of Employment-Generating Schemes: While numerous schemes are announced to boost employment, their on-ground implementation often lacks efficiency, reducing their overall impact (Bhagwati and Panagariya, 2013).

D.Technological Factors:

Automation: With advancements in robotics, artificial intelligence and other technologies, many tasks previously performed by humans are getting automated, leading to job displacements in certain sectors (Chui et al., 2016).

Outdated Skills: The rapid pace of technological change can render certain skills obsolete, leading to structural unemployment for those who don’t update their skill sets (World Economic Forum, 2018).

While addressing unemployment in India requires a nuanced understanding of its root causes, which are interwoven in the country’s economic, social, political and technological fabric.

Consequences of High Unemployment

Persistently high unemployment levels not only reflect an underutilized labor force but also have deep-reaching consequences across economic, social and political spheres. Understanding these ramifications is critical to gauge the broader impact of unemployment on a nation and its populace.

A.Economic Impacts:

Lower GDP Growth: With a significant part of the workforce unemployed, a country’s productive capacity remains unutilized, leading to slower economic growth. High unemployment often correlates with decreased GDP growth (Blanchard and Summers, 1986).

Reduced Consumer Spending: Unemployed individuals tend to have reduced purchasing power. This can lead to decreased consumer spending, adversely impacting businesses and leading to economic contractions (Mankiw, 2014).

B.Social Impacts:

Mental Health Issues: Unemployment is often linked to psychological stresses, including depression, anxiety and reduced self-esteem. The mental health repercussions can be long-lasting and profound (Paul and Moser, 2009).

Crime: Research has indicated a connection between high unemployment rates and increased crime, particularly property crimes. Economic desperation can be a factor pushing individuals towards illegal activities (Fougère et al., 2009).

Social Unrest: Persistent unemployment can lead to general discontent, potentially culminating in social unrest, protests and even riots, especially if large sections of the youth are unemployed (Brück et al., 2019).

C.Political Impacts:

Instability: High unemployment can erode trust in incumbent governments and institutions, leading to political instability and frequent changes in leadership or policy directions (Baltagi and Bresson, 2018).

Rise in Populist Movements: Economic hardships and dissatisfaction due to unemployment can drive the electorate towards populist movements or parties that promise radical solutions or scapegoat certain groups or establishments (Colantone and Stanig, 2018).

The ramifications of high unemployment extend well beyond mere economic indicators, influencing the very fabric of societies and political landscapes.

Possible Solutions and Way Out for Unemployment in India

Addressing unemployment requires a multi-pronged strategy, given the myriad factors contributing to the challenge. By integrating policy interventions, technological solutions, educational reforms and financial incentives, it is possible to craft a comprehensive response to this persistent issue.

A.Policy Interventions:

Skill Development and Vocational Training Programs: Investing in programs that offer training in skills relevant to the current job market can bridge the gap between employer demands and available talent (McGrath, 2012).

Infrastructure Development: By building robust infrastructure - be it roads, ports, or digital networks - governments can attract investments and catalyze job creation (Calderón and Servén, 2010).

Promotion of Entrepreneurship and MSMEs: MSMEs are significant employment generators. Policies that ease the process of starting and running small businesses can lead to job growth (Ayyagari et al., 2011).

B.Technological Solutions:

Promoting Technology Hubs and Incubation Centers: Such hubs can attract talent and investments, fostering startups and innovative solutions and consequently generating employment (Isenberg, 2010).

Digital Literacy and Training in Emerging Fields: With the world increasingly going digital, equipping the workforce with digital skills is no longer a luxury but a necessity (Van Deursen and Van Dijk, 2014).

C.Educational Reforms:

Curriculum Overhaul: Modernizing curriculums to resonate with industry needs ensures graduates are job-ready (Marginson, 2016).

Promotion of Internships and Apprenticeships: Practical experience complements theoretical knowledge, making candidates more appealing to employers (Smith, 2012).

D.Financial Incentives:

Tax Breaks: Offering tax incentives to businesses that hire new employees or invest in training can stimulate job creation (Gentry and Hubbard, 2000).

Government-Backed Loans for Startups and Entrepreneurs: By providing financial support to new ventures, governments can foster a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship (Kerr et al., 2014).

Addressing unemployment is a multifaceted endeavor requiring coordinated efforts across various sectors. With the right mix of strategies, it is possible to harness India’s demographic dividend and achieve sustainable economic growth.

Conclusion

The challenge of unemployment in India, with its multifarious dimensions and profound implications, stands as a testament to the complexities of navigating economic and social terrains in the world’s largest democracy.

The unemployment scenario in India, marked by stark regional variations and sectoral disparities, mirrors the intricacies of its socio-economic framework. From urban centers where educated youth grapple with joblessness to rural hinterlands affected by seasonal employment gaps, the challenge is both vast and multifaceted (Deshpande, 2019; Chand and Sahoo, 2020).

Merely acknowledging the issue isn’t sufficient. A proactive, adaptive and multi-dimensional approach is imperative. Drawing inspiration from international successes and learning from domestic shortcomings, it is clear that holistic strategies—combining education, technology, policy reforms and financial incentives—are crucial (World Bank, 2020).

The road to addressing unemployment is paved with collaborative endeavors. The government, with its policy might, needs to set conducive frameworks. The private sector, as the engine of innovation and growth, must focus on inclusive job creation. Civil society, representing the grassroots, can provide insights, facilitate skill development and ensure on-ground implementation of initiatives. A symbiotic relationship amongst these stakeholders is the cornerstone of a resilient employment landscape (Sen, 2001; Bhagwati and Panagariya, 2013).

While the challenge is formidable, so are the collective capabilities of the nation. By harnessing these, India can not only address unemployment but also set a precedent for sustainable socio-economic growth.

How to cite this article: Srivastava M. (2023). Unemployment in India and Way-out. The Social Ion,12 (1&2), 46-56.

References

Aggarwal

( 2013). What is really ailing the Indian labour market: Job or wage?. Economic and Political Weekly, 48( 32), 47–54.

Ayyagari

Demirgüc-Kunt

Maksimovic

( 2011). Small vs. young firms across the world: contribution to employment, job creation and growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, ( 5631).

Baltagi

Bresson

( 2018). Maximum likelihood estimation and lagrange multiplier tests for panel seemingly unrelated regressions with spatial lag and spatial errors: An application to hedonic housing prices in Paris. Journal of Urban Economics, 104, 37–54.

Bernanke

( 1983). Nonmonetary effects of the financial crisis in the propagation of the Great Depression. American Economic Review, 73( 3), 257–276.

Bhagwati

Panagariya

( 2013). Why growth matters: How economic growth in India reduced poverty and the lessons for other developing countries. Public Affairs.

Blanchard

Summers

( 1986). Hysteresis and the European unemployment problem. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1, 15–78.

Borjas

( 2019). Labor economics. McGraw-Hill Education.

Brück

d’Errico

Pietrelli

( 2019). The effects of violent conflict on household resilience and food security: Evidence from the 2014 Gaza conflict. World Development, 119, 203–223.

Brynjolfsson

McAfee

( 2014). The second machine age: Work, progress and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton and Company.

Calderón

Servén

( 2010). Infrastructure and economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies, 19( suppl_1), i13–i87.

Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). ( 2022). Unemployment rate in India. Retrieved from https://www.cmie.com/

Chakrabarty

( 2008). Indian politics and society since independence. Routledge.

Chand

Sahoo

( 2020). Changing structure of rural economy of India implications for employment and growth. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75 ( 1).

Chandrasekhar

Ghosh

( 2019). The unemployment crisis: Reasons and solutions. Economic and Political Weekly, 54( 27), 38–44.

Chui

Manyika

Miremadi

( 2016). Where machines could replace humans—and where they can't (yet). McKinsey Quarterly.

CMIE. ( 2020). Impact of COVID-19 on unemployment. Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy.

Colantone

Stanig

( 2018). The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62( 4), 936–953.

Crafts

Toniolo

(Eds.). ( 1996). Economic growth in Europe since 1945. Cambridge University Press.

Datt

Sundharam

KPM

Mahajan

( 2017). Indian economy. S. Chand Publishing.

Deshpande

( 2019). Demographic challenge and employment growth in India. World Development, 115, 291–302.

Dreze

Sen

( 2013). An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions. Princeton University Press.

Fougère

Kramarz

Pouget

( 2009). Youth unemployment and crime in France. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7( 5), 909–938.

Gentry

Hubbard

( 2000). Tax policy and entrepreneurial entry. American Economic Review, 90( 2), 283–287.

Isenberg

( 2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88( 6), 40–50.

Kerr

Lerner

Schoar

( 2014). The consequences of entrepreneurial finance: Evidence from angel financings. The Review of Financial Studies, 27( 1), 20–55.

Klasen

Pieters

( 2015). What explains the stagnation of female labor force participation in urban India?. World Bank Economic Review, 29( 3), 449–478.

Kohli

( 2006). Politics of economic growth in India, 1980-2005. Economic and Political Weekly, 41( 13), 1251–1259.

Krishnan

( 2011). Evolution of the Indian labor market: A brief overview. Economic and Political Weekly, 46( 10), 10–12.

Mankiw

( 2014). Principles of economics. Cengage Learning.

Marginson

( 2016). Higher education and growing inequality. In The Handbook of Global Higher Education (pp. 49–69). Palgrave Macmillan.

McGrath

( 2012). Building new approaches to thinking about vocational education and training and development: Policy, theory and evidence. International Journal of Educational Development, 32( 5), 619–622.

Mehrotra

Parida

( 2019). Why is the labor force participation of women declining in India?World Development, 115, 346–359.

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. ( 2019). Periodic Labour Force Survey (2018-19). Government of India.

http://mospi.nic.in/plfs-annual-report

Mokyr

( 1999). The British industrial revolution: An economic perspective. Westview Press.

Nayyar

( 2008). Globalization: what does it mean for higher education?Economic and Political Weekly, 43( 50), 37–45.

NITI Aayog. ( 2019). Strategy for New India @ 75. New Delhi: Government of India.

Papola

Kannan

( 2017). Towards an India at work strategy. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 60( 1), 9–39.

Paul

Moser

( 2009). Unemployment impairs mental health: Meta-analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74( 3), 264–282.

Romer

( 1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98 ( 5), S71–S102.

Roy

( 2002). Economic history and modern India: Redefining the link. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16( 3), 109–130.

Sachs

Warner

( 1995). Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–118.

Sen

( 2001). The many faces of gender inequality. New Republic, 226( 12), 35–39.

Smith

( 2012). Workplaces as learning environments: the role of training and the training effort of Australian employers. NCVER Monograph Series, ( 5/2012).

Van Deursen

Van Dijk

( 2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media and Society, 16( 3), 507–526.

World Bank2020). Population, total – India.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=IN

World Bank. ( 2020). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. World Bank Publications.

World Economic Forum. ( 2018). The future of jobs report 2018. World Economic Forum, Geneva.