1Professor & Head,
2Field Work Supervisor,
3Field Work Organiser,
*(Corresponding author) email id: dr.rakeshdwivedi@gmail.com
The paper explores the concept of “Ekatma Manavvaad” (Integral Humanism) developed by Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay, a prominent Indian thinker, and its relevance to social work with Indian knowledge systems. It delves into Upadhyay’s philosophy, which sought to present an indigenous socio-economic model centred on human well-being, in contrast to Western ideologies like capitalism and socialism. Upadhyay’s Integral Humanism emphasizes the balanced development of the individual, encompassing the physical, mental, intellectual, and spiritual dimensions. It rejects the fragmented view of human beings and instead advocates for a holistic approach that considers the individual’s relationship with the collective, the universe, and the Supreme. The paper highlights Upadhyay’s critique of Western ideologies for their one-sided focus on material development and their inability to address the multifaceted needs of the human being. Integral Humanism is presented as an alternative to the imposition of non-Indian ideologies in post-independent India, which have led to environmental imbalances, the disintegration of social and cultural values, and the neglect of the needs of the marginalized. The paper emphasizes the importance of Upadhyay’s concept of “Antyodaya,” which focuses on the upliftment of the most deprived sections of society. The paper also explores the relevance of Integral Humanism in the current global context, where the world is seeking a more integrated and sustainable development model. It argues that Integral Humanism, with its emphasis on balanced development, sustainable resource consumption, and the enhancement of political, economic, and social democracy, can provide a viable alternative to the prevailing development paradigms.
Integral humanism, Ekatma Manavvaad, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay, Indian knowledge systems, Social work, Sustainable development, Antyodaya