ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
  • Year: 2013
  • Volume: 3
  • Issue: 5

Self-corrections: Learner language of engineering undergraduates of ESL

  • Author:
  • Varalakshmi Chaudhry
  • Total Page Count: 5
  • Page Number: 244 to 248

Associate Professor, English, NC College of Engineering, Israna (Panipat) Haryana

Online published on 20 June, 2013.

Abstract

The present study gives important insights into the kind of Self-Corrections or online processing that is done by the learners in a written test. Self-Corrections are a reflection of the on-line processing while performing a task; and the degree of seriousness for focus on accuracy of expression the subjects try to achieve. The instances of self-correction from Levelt (1989) in the context of first language acquisition are given below:

Right-further to the right (expansion for exactness)

To the left side of the purple disc is a v-horizontal line (the word vertical intercepted)

What things are this kid-is this kid going to say incorrectly? (agreement)

Why it is-why is it that nobody makes a decent toilet seat? (ordering)

A unut– unit from the yellow dot (phonology)

From my prosOdic – proSodic colleagues (phonology)

Some of the instances of Self-Corrections from our study are:

Change of Plan: Arundhati Roy never attracted so much – attracted masses; In brief – The story talks about

Exactness of Expression: Is this will –decision will lead; from – right from

Grammatical: Life is a wheels-wheel; even an – a venerated person; Ravi Shankar was – is

The data analysis reveals a total of 1297 instances of self-correction across the 15 speakers. This is a clear indication of the high on-line processing that goes on in the written performance of learners. Most of them are successful self-corrections and even the nature of self correction is interesting.

The theoretical basis for the study is from W. J. M Levelt (1989) on `Speaking: From Intention to Articulation’; Varalakshmi (1993 & 1996) on `Monitoring and Self-Monitoring in Speech Performance’; and R. Ellis (2005) on `Analysing Learner Language’.