1Research Scholar,
2Associate Professor,
3Research Scholar,
Investigations of cybercrime today require forensic architectures that natively traverse multiple blockchains with ease while protecting and scaling evidence processing. Although blockchains support tamper- evident logs, their original single-chain architecture limits cross-platform interoperability and forensic scaling. Recent developments overcome these limitations such as zero-knowledge proofs supporting private but verifiable evidence verification, sharding architectures splitting state without compromising latency, and AI-based anomaly detectors identifying subtle tampering. But challenges remains like zero–knowledge proofs are computationally expensive, sharding poses intricate state-consistency problems and AI models need to be retrained constantly, incurring operational burden. Future research needs to make these pieces work for real-time, large-scale forensic applications by designing light-weight zero-knowledge constructs, self-tuning shard governance systems and compact AI with incremental-update threads. Integrating such abilities into single frameworks will offer privacy, scalability and security, supporting forensic processes for which courts will give credit in various, changing block-chain environments.
Cross-Chain Interoperability, Digital Forensics, Blockchain Provenance, Security, Scalability