Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing
  • Year: 2025
  • Volume: 39
  • Issue: 1spl

Marketing Efficiency of Cashewnut in Chikkaballapur District of Karnataka, India

  • Author:
  • D. Nagesh, K. R. Nethrayini1, G. M. Gaddi, V. Venkatachalapathi2, R. Lavanya
  • Total Page Count: 1
  • Page Number: 177 to 177

1Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Sericulture, Chintamani-563125

2Department of Agronomy, College of Sericulture, Chintamani-563125

Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Bangalore-560065

Online Published on 10 June, 2025.

Abstract

The study investigated the marketing channels involved in the distribution of cashew nuts in the Chikkaballapur district, analyzing data collected from 30 market intermediaries, including producers, village traders, processors, wholesalers, retailers, and consumers. Three distinct marketing channels were identified: Channel I (Producer ➝ Village Trader ➝ Processor ➝ Retailer ➝ Consumer), Channel II (Producer ➝ APMC Trader ➝ Processor ➝ Wholesaler ➝ Retailer ➝ Consumer), and Channel III (Producer ➝ Processor ➝ Wholesaler ➝ Retailer ➝ Consumer). The analysis revealed significant differences in price spread, marketing costs, margins, and producer’s share across the channels. Channel III emerged as the most efficient, with the lowest price spread (₹ 9,275), highest producer’s share in the consumer’s rupee (₹ 58.35%), and highest marketing efficiency (1.40). Conversely, Channel II showed the highest price spread (₹ 11,042.65) and marketing costs (₹ 3,766.65), while Channel I had the lowest efficiency (1.14). The producer’s selling price increased from ₹ 11,026.20 in Channel I to ₹ 12,995.65 in Channel III, while the consumer’s purchasing price ranged from ₹ 22,270.65 in Channel III to ₹ 23,875.70 in Channel II. The study highlights the importance of reducing intermediaries to improve efficiency and enhance the producer’s share.

Keywords

Cashewnut, Marketing Channel, Marketing Efficiency, Price spread