1Agricultural Informatics, Shobit University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Research Centre, Chhalesar, Agra-282006, Uttar Pradesh, India
*E-mail:skdubeyagra@gmail.com
Online published on 11 September, 2012.
An on farm study was conducted during summer season of 2004-5 and 2005-6 on cotton in semi arid region of Agra with three levels of supplementary irrigation (I1: irrigation at 21 DAS; I2: irrigation at 42 DAS and I3:I1 + I2) and plant geometry (S1: 60 x 30; S2: 60 x 45 and S3: 60 x 60 cm) in split plot design in cotton-wheat cropping sequence. Residual effect of irrigation and plant density in cotton was evaluated on succeeding wheat. The yield performance of cotton-wheat system was compared with pearl millet-wheat raised on nearby farmer's fields in terms of pearl millet equivalent. Results showed that I1 recorded significantly higher mean seed cotton yield (1546 kg ha−1), total biomass yield (3791 kg ha−1), net return (Rs 32265 ha−1) and benefit cost ratio (1.87) than I1 and I3 in cotton-wheat system. Although, I2 recorded significantly higher mean cotton stalk yield (2319 kg ha−1), wheat grain (3791 kg ha−1) and straw (4898 kg ha−1) yield but mean seed cotton yield (1389 kg ha−1) and monetary returns (net return: Rs 28984 ha−1 and benefit cost ratio: 1.79) was minimum among different irrigation treatments tested in cotton-wheat system. S3 recorded significantly higher mean seed cotton yield (1615 kg ha−1), total biomass yield (3859 kg ha−1), main branches plant−1 (15.9), balls plant−1 (36.2) and wheat grain yield (3810 kg ha−1) due to lower competition on behalf of more space plant−1. S3 also recorded significantly higher mean net return (Rs 40011 ha−1) and benefit cost ratio (1.92) than other plant geometry treatments in cotton-wheat system. Among interactions, I2S3 recorded significantly higher seed cotton yield (1694 kg ha−1) and benefit cost ratio (1.96) but variations in wheat grain yield and net returns under different interactions of irrigation and plant geometry were not significant. Cotton-wheat produced higher wheat yield (3786.5 kg ha−1) than pearl millet-wheat (3416 kg ha−1) system. Cotton-wheat also produced higher mean pearl millet equivalent (8270 kg ha−1) than pearl millet-wheat (2394 kg ha−1) in the kharif season.
Cropping sequence, Competition, Monetary returns, Plant geometry, Supplementary irrigation