Indian Journal of Soil Conservation

  • Year: 2015
  • Volume: 43
  • Issue: 2

Resource conservation and performance of aonla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn) under varying tree density and in situ live mulching in rainfed conditions of north west India

  • Author:
  • R.K. Dubey1, A.C. Rathore2,, K.S. Dadhwal2, N.K. Sharma2
  • Total Page Count: 7
  • DOI:
  • Page Number: 175 to 181

1ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Chhalesar, Agra-282006, Uttar Pradesh

2ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, 218 Kaulagarh Road, Dehradun-248 195, Uttarakhand

Abstract

A study comprising of two densities of aonla (D1: 6x6m and D2: 8x8m) and four insitu live mulching options (T1: Control; T2: cowpea mulch; T3: weed mulch and T4: sunhemp mulch) was conducted in split plot design with three replications for eight years (2002 to 2009) at Selakui, Dehradun. Influence of different tree density and residue input to soil due to different live mulch options on vegetative growth and fruit yield and quality of aonla as well as soil and in-situ rain water conservation was evaluated in aonla based agri-horti system with rainfed maize-wheat/mustard sequence on 2.0% sloping land provided with multi-slot devisors. D1(277 trees ha−1) significantly enhanced tree height (15.0%), fruit yield (37.7%) and litter fall (47.8%) besides 47.0% reduction in soil loss over D2 (156 trees ha−1). D2 also significantly improved crown spread, girth at breast height (GBH), fruit weight and TSS: acid ratio than D1by 13.2, 9.0, 15.0 and 5.0%, respectively which may be attributed due to lower tree-tree interface on account of more space planrl that directly relates to higher availability and utilization of growth resources mainly the moisture and nutrients. Different residue inputs to soil (variable in C:N ratio and quantity) under distinct live mulch options invariably improved aonla tree growth, fruit yield and quality over the control. T4 treatment outperformed other live mulch options and recorded maximum improvement in tree height, crown spread, GBH, fruit yield and litter yield that was equivalent to 16, 13, 9.0, 27 and 40%, respectively over unmulched control. Among interactions (DxT), D1T4 recorded significantly higher tree height (3.54 m), crown spread (689.73 m2 ha−1), fruit yield (8.14 t ha−1), litter yield (3.27 t ha−1) and moisture conservation (57.65%) but variations in tree height were statistically at par with D1T3 (3.36 m). Similarly, D2T4 also recorded significantly higher crown spread (2.78 m2 tree−1), GBH (29.3 cm), fruit yield (35.63 kg ha−1), litter yield (14.74 kg tree−1) and fruit weight (42.2 g) but variations were statistically at par with D1T2 in crown spread (2.69 m2 tree−1) and with D2T3 in litter yield (13.21 kg tree−1). Significantly higher TSS: Acid ratio was produced by D1T2 (5.35). D1T4 recorded minimum soil loss (4.90 t ha−1) and runoff(17.50%) and led to significantly higher moisture conservation (57.45%). The higher BC ratio (1.49) was observed in case of D1T4 followed byD1T2 witha net retum of ' 194935 and 164425 ha−1 was produced due to fruits and dry woodbiomass.

Keywords

Biological yield, Crop residues, Net return, Plant density, Vegetative growth